↓ Skip to main content

Anti-CA15.3 and anti-CA125 antibodies and ovarian cancer risk: Results from the EPIC cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anti-CA15.3 and anti-CA125 antibodies and ovarian cancer risk: Results from the EPIC cohort
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, July 2018
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-17-0744
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel W Cramer, Raina N Fichorova, Kathryn L Terry, Hidemi Yamamoto, Allison F Vitonis, Eva Ardanaz, Dagfinn Aune, Heiner Boeing, Jenny Brändstedt, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Maria-Dolores Chirlaque, Miren Dorronsoro, Laure Dossus, Eric J Duell, Inger T Gram, Marc Gunter, Louise Hansen, Annika Idahl, Theron Johnson, Kay-Tee Khaw, Vittorio Krogh, Marina Kvaskoff, Amalia Mattiello, Giuseppe Matullo, Melissa A Merritt, Björn Nodin, Philippos Orfanos, N Charlotte Onland-Moret, Domenico Palli, Eleni Peppa, J Ramón Quirós, Maria-Jose Sánchez-Perez, Gianluca Severi, Anne Tjønneland, Ruth C Travis, Antonia Trichopoulou, Rosario Tumino, Elisabete Weiderpass, Renée T Fortner, Rudolf Kaaks

Abstract

Neoplastic and non-neoplastic events may raise levels of mucins, CA15.3 and CA125, and generate antibodies against them; but their impact on epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk has not been fully defined. CA15.3, CA125, and IgG1 antibodies against them were measured in 806 women who developed EOC and 1,927 matched controls from the European Prospective Investigation of Nutrition and Cancer. Associations between epidemiologic factors and anti-mucin antibodies were evaluated using generalized linear models; EOC risks associated with anti-mucin antibodies, by themselves or in combination with respective antigens, were evaluated using conditional logistic regression. In controls, lower antibodies against both mucins were associated with current smoking; and, in postmenopausal women, higher levels with longer oral contraceptive use and later-age-at and shorter-interval-since last birth. Lower anti-CA15.3 antibodies were associated with higher body mass and, in premenopausal women, more ovulatory cycles. Higher anti-CA15.3 and anti-CA125 antibodies were associated with higher risk for mucinous EOC occurring ≥ 3 years from enrollment. Long-term risk for serous EOC was reduced in women with low CA125 and high anti-CA125 antibodies relative to women with low concentrations of both. We found general support for the hypothesis that anti-mucin antibody levels correlate with risk factors for EOC. Antibodies alone or in combinations with their antigen may predict longer term risk of specific EOC types. Anti-CA125 and anti- CA15.3 antibodies alone or in perspective of antigens may be informative in the pathogenesis of EOC subtypes, but less useful for informing risk for all EOC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Professor 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 9 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,045,303
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#2,951
of 4,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,500
of 341,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#25
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.