↓ Skip to main content

始まりを問う哲学史

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophy (Tetsugaku), April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 174)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
始まりを問う哲学史
Published in
Philosophy (Tetsugaku), April 2017
DOI 10.11439/philosophy.2017.45
Authors

納富 信留

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,190,103
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy (Tetsugaku)
#28
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,980
of 323,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy (Tetsugaku)
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.