↓ Skip to main content

23–valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in HIV-1-infected Ugandan adults: double-blind, randomised and placebo controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, June 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
416 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
23–valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in HIV-1-infected Ugandan adults: double-blind, randomised and placebo controlled trial
Published in
The Lancet, June 2000
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02377-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

N French, J Nakiyingi, LM Carpenter, E Lugada, C Watera, K Moi, M Moore, D Antvelink, D Mulder, EN Janoff, J Whitworth, CF Gilks

Abstract

Infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae is a frequent and serious problem for HIV-immunosuppressed adults. Vaccination is recommended in the USA and Europe, but there are no prospective data that show vaccine efficacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 2 2%
Malawi 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 112 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 22 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 13%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,415,054
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#16,721
of 42,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,169
of 39,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#48
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.