| Title |
An overview of existing and promising technologies for national forest monitoring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Forest Science , March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13595-015-0463-z |
| Authors |
Matieu Henry, Maxime Réjou-Méchain, Miguel Cifuentes Jara, Craig Wayson, Daniel Piotto, James Westfall, José María Michel Fuentes, Federico Alice Guier, Héctor Castañeda Lombis, Edwin Castellanos López, Ruby Cuenca Lara, Kelvin Cueva Rojas, Jhon Del Águila Pasquel, Álvaro Duque Montoya, Javier Fernández Vega, Abner Jiménez Galo, Omar R. López, Lars Gunnar Marklund, Fabián Milla, José de Jesús Návar Cahidez, Edgar Ortiz Malavassi, Johnny Pérez, Carla Ramírez Zea, Luis Rangel García, Rafael Rubilar Pons, Carlos Sanquetta, Charles Scott, Mauricio Zapata-Cuartas, Laurent Saint-André |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 43% |
| Panama | 1 | 14% |
| Finland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 21% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 38 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Engineering | 10 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 35 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,307,749
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#478
of 1,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,600
of 281,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.