| Title |
Protection of pancreatic β-cell function by dietary polyphenols
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytochemistry Reviews, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11101-015-9429-x |
| Authors |
Margherita Dall’Asta, Morgane Bayle, Jérémie Neasta, Francesca Scazzina, Renato Bruni, Gérard Cros, Daniele Del Rio, Catherine Oiry |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 31% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,026,790
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Phytochemistry Reviews
#19
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,625
of 263,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytochemistry Reviews
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them