↓ Skip to main content

Current ADC Linker Chemistry

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 2,987)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
patent
134 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
322 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
715 Mendeley
Title
Current ADC Linker Chemistry
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11095-015-1657-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nareshkumar Jain, Sean W. Smith, Sanjeevani Ghone, Bruce Tomczuk

Abstract

The list of ADCs in the clinic continues to grow, bolstered by the success of first two marketed ADCs: ADCETRIS® and Kadcyla®. Currently, there are 40 ADCs in various phases of clinical development. However, only 34 of these have published their structures. Of the 34 disclosed structures, 24 of them use a linkage to the thiol of cysteines on the monoclonal antibody. The remaining 10 candidates utilize chemistry to surface lysines of the antibody. Due to the inherent heterogeneity of conjugation to the multiple lysines or cysteines found in mAbs, significant research efforts are now being directed toward the production of discrete, homogeneous ADC products, via site-specific conjugation. These site-specific conjugations may involve genetic engineering of the mAb to introduce discrete, available cysteines or non-natural amino acids with an orthogonally-reactive functional group handle such as an aldehyde, ketone, azido, or alkynyl tag. These site-specific approaches not only increase the homogeneity of ADCs but also enable novel bio-orthogonal chemistries that utilize reactive moieties other than thiol or amine. This broadens the diversity of linkers that can be utilized which will lead to better linker design in future generations of ADCs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 715 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 706 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 142 20%
Researcher 110 15%
Student > Bachelor 89 12%
Student > Master 68 10%
Other 44 6%
Other 72 10%
Unknown 190 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 199 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 105 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 57 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 4%
Other 71 10%
Unknown 200 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#825,092
of 25,177,382 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#16
of 2,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,202
of 265,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,177,382 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.