↓ Skip to main content

A Transcriptomic Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Under the Stress of 2-Phenylethanol

Overview of attention for article published in Current Microbiology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
A Transcriptomic Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Under the Stress of 2-Phenylethanol
Published in
Current Microbiology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00284-018-1488-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danfeng Jin, Bintao Gu, Dawei Xiong, Guochang Huang, Xiaoping Huang, Lan Liu, Jun Xiao

Abstract

2-Phenylethanol (2-PE) is a kind of advanced aromatic alcohol with rose fragrance, which is wildly used for the deployment of flavors and fragrances. Microbial transformation is the most feasible method for the production of natural 2-PE. But a bottleneck problem is the toxicity of 2-PE on the cells. The molecular mechanisms of the toxic effect of 2-PE to Saccharomyces cerevisiae are not well studied. In this study, we analyzed the transcriptomes of S. cerevisiae in the media with and without 2-PE, respectively, using Illumina RNA-Seq technology. We identified 580 differentially expressed genes between S. cerevisiae in two different treatments. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses of these genes suggested that most genes encoding mitochondrial proteins, cytoplasmic, and plasma membrane proteins were significantly up-regulated, whereas the enzymes related to amino acid metabolism were down-regulated. These results indicated that 2-PE suppressed the synthesis of plasma membrane proteins, which suppressed the transport of nutrients required for growth. The findings in this study will provide insight into the inhibitory mechanism of 2-PE to yeast and other microbes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 21%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Lecturer 1 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 21%
Engineering 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2018.
All research outputs
#16,704,527
of 24,569,575 outputs
Outputs from Current Microbiology
#1,501
of 2,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,596
of 331,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Microbiology
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,569,575 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,586 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.