| Title |
Residents’ reluctance to challenge negative hierarchy in the operating room: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12630-015-0364-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Dylan Bould, Stephanie Sutherland, Devin T. Sydor, Viren Naik, Zeev Friedman |
| Abstract |
Our aim was to clarify how hierarchy influences residents' reluctance to challenge authority with respect to clearly erroneous medical decision-making. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 24 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 14% |
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 34% |
| Scientists | 10 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 26% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2021.
All research outputs
#644,618
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#42
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,854
of 277,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.