↓ Skip to main content

Standard dosing of amikacin and gentamicin in critically ill patients results in variable and subtherapeutic concentrations

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Standard dosing of amikacin and gentamicin in critically ill patients results in variable and subtherapeutic concentrations
Published in
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, March 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.02.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire Roger, Bastian Nucci, Nicolas Molinari, Sophie Bastide, Gilbert Saissi, Gael Pradel, Saber Barbar, Clément Aubert, Sophie Lloret, Loubna Elotmani, Anne Polge, Jean-Yves Lefrant, Jason A. Roberts, Laurent Muller

Abstract

Low peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of amikacin and gentamicin are reported in intensive care unit (ICU) patients after administration of the first dose. The present study aimed to describe the proportion of ICU patients in whom an adequate Cmax was achieved throughout the course of therapy. Septic ICU patients with an indication for intravenous amikacin or gentamicin were eligible for inclusion in this single-centre observational study. The first and subsequent doses and the corresponding Cmax values were recorded. The target Cmax was ≥60mg/L for amikacin and ≥30mg/L for gentamicin. Amikacin and gentamicin plasma concentrations were available in 66 and 24 patients, respectively (59±17 years; 79±19kg; height 169±12cm; SAPS II score 46±19). Pulmonary, abdominal and urinary tract infections were diagnosed in 64 patients. Culture-positive infection was confirmed in 65 patients (72%). A target first Cmax was achieved in 17/90 patients (19%). For amikacin, the target Cmax was achieved in 16/66 patients (24%) after the initial dose. In the 50 remaining patients, a change in dosing was performed in 14 patients, leading adequate peak plasma level in 2 patients. For gentamicin, the targeted Cmax was achieved in only 1/24 patient (4%) after the initial dose and was never achieved after the third dose. In conclusion, standard dosing of amikacin or gentamicin led to adequate Cmax in only 19% of patients. Subtherapeutic Cmax were not significantly corrected after subsequent doses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Other 9 13%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 37%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,356,550
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
#968
of 3,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,579
of 278,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
#16
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.