| Title |
Automatic detection of lytic and blastic thoracolumbar spine metastases on computed tomography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-013-2774-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthias Hammon, Peter Dankerl, Alexey Tsymbal, Michael Wels, Michael Kelm, Matthias May, Michael Suehling, Michael Uder, Alexander Cavallaro |
| Abstract |
To evaluate a computer-aided detection (CADe) system for lytic and blastic spinal metastases on computed tomography (CT). |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 34% |
| Engineering | 9 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,212,132
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,066
of 4,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,369
of 285,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,115 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.