↓ Skip to main content

Tools and Methods Used to Represent Geological Processes and Geosites: Graphic and Animated Media as a Means to Popularize the Scientific Content and Value of Geoheritage

Overview of attention for article published in Geoheritage, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Tools and Methods Used to Represent Geological Processes and Geosites: Graphic and Animated Media as a Means to Popularize the Scientific Content and Value of Geoheritage
Published in
Geoheritage, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12371-014-0101-4
Authors

C. Lansigu, V. Bosse-Lansigu, F. Le Hebel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 41%
Environmental Science 6 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,265,771
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Geoheritage
#209
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,644
of 223,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoheritage
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.