↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility of common carotid artery point of care ultrasound in cardiac output measurements compared to invasive methods

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ultrasound, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 652)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Feasibility of common carotid artery point of care ultrasound in cardiac output measurements compared to invasive methods
Published in
Journal of Ultrasound, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40477-014-0139-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marika Gassner, Keith Killu, Zachary Bauman, Victor Coba, Kelly Rosso, Dionne Blyden

Abstract

Cardiac output (CO) measurement in the intensive care unit (ICU) requires invasive devices such as the pulmonary artery (PA) catheter or arterial waveform pulse contour analysis (PCA). This study tests the accuracy and feasibility of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) of the common carotid artery to estimate the CO non-invasively and compare it to existing invasive CO measurement modalities. Patients admitted to the surgical and cardiothoracic ICU in a tertiary university-affiliated academic center during a 4-month period, with invasive hemodynamic monitoring devices for management, were included in this cohort study. Common carotid artery POCUS was performed to measure the CO and the results were compared to an invasive device. Intensivists and ICU fellows, using ultrasound of the common carotid artery, obtained the CO measurements. Images of the Doppler flow and volume were obtained at the level of the thyroid gland. Concurrent CO measured via invasive devices was recorded. The patient cohort comprised 36 patients; 52 % were females. The average age was 59 ± 13 years, and 66 % were monitored via PCA device and 33 % via PA catheter. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis demonstrated almost perfect correlation (0.8152) between measurements of CO via ultrasound vs. invasive modalities. The ICC between POCUS and the invasive measurement via PCA was 0.84 and via PA catheter 0.74, showing substantial agreement between the ultrasound and both invasive modalities. Common carotid artery POCUS offers a non-invasive method of measuring the CO in the critically ill population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 11 19%
Researcher 10 17%
Other 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 59%
Engineering 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2018.
All research outputs
#2,857,743
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ultrasound
#27
of 652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,469
of 271,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ultrasound
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 652 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them