You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the effect of aerobic vs. resistance exercise training on visceral fat
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Obesity Reviews, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-789x.2011.00931.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
I. Ismail, S. E. Keating, M. K. Baker, N. A. Johnson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 15% |
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 529 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 511 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 91 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 83 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 11% |
| Researcher | 39 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 6% |
| Other | 109 | 21% |
| Unknown | 114 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 128 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 5% |
| Psychology | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 60 | 11% |
| Unknown | 149 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#270,411
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Reviews
#113
of 2,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#941
of 144,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Reviews
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.