↓ Skip to main content

The Neanderthal in the karst: First dating, morphometric, and paleogenetic data on the fossil skeleton from Altamura (Italy)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Human Evolution, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 2,377)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
38 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
142 X users
facebook
19 Facebook pages
wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Neanderthal in the karst: First dating, morphometric, and paleogenetic data on the fossil skeleton from Altamura (Italy)
Published in
Journal of Human Evolution, March 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.02.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martina Lari, Fabio Di Vincenzo, Andrea Borsato, Silvia Ghirotto, Mario Micheli, Carlotta Balsamo, Carmine Collina, Gianluca De Bellis, Silvia Frisia, Giacomo Giacobini, Elena Gigli, John C. Hellstrom, Antonella Lannino, Alessandra Modi, Alessandro Pietrelli, Elena Pilli, Antonio Profico, Oscar Ramirez, Ermanno Rizzi, Stefania Vai, Donata Venturo, Marcello Piperno, Carles Lalueza-Fox, Guido Barbujani, David Caramelli, Giorgio Manzi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 142 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 118 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 28%
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Master 10 8%
Other 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 23%
Arts and Humanities 22 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 27 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 450. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2023.
All research outputs
#61,980
of 25,482,409 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Evolution
#12
of 2,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#594
of 277,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Evolution
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,482,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.