↓ Skip to main content

Autologous stem cell transplantation in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis with factor X deficiency

Overview of attention for article published in Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autologous stem cell transplantation in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis with factor X deficiency
Published in
Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, January 2016
DOI 10.1097/mbc.0000000000000367
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Cordes, Morie A. Gertz, Francis K. Buadi, Yi Lin, Martha Q. Lacy, Prashant Kapoor, Shaji K. Kumar, Arleigh McCurdy, Angela Dispenzieri, David Dingli, Suzanne R. Hayman, William J. Hogan, Rajiv K. Pruthi

Abstract

Acquired factor X deficiency and associated haemorrhage can be consequences of immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis. There are limited data on the safety and efficacy of autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) on factor X deficiency. We retrospectively reviewed immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis patients with factor X levels below 50%, not on chronic anticoagulation who underwent ASCT at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, between April 1995 and December 2011. Twenty-seven of 358 patients (7.5%) met study criteria. Median pre-ASCT factor X was 36% (range: 2-49%). The most frequent and severe bleeding complications occurred in patients with factor X levels below 10%. Peri-procedural prophylaxis included activated recombinant factor VII, fresh frozen plasma and platelet transfusions. Steady-state post-ASCT factor X levels were determined in 12 patients. Post-ASCT factor X levels increased in 100% of patients, with median factor X improvement of +32% (range: +8 to +92%). About 46.2% of patients were no longer factor X deficient after ASCT. The degree of improvement in factor X levels was correlated with an improvement in markers of renal involvement by amyloid. Improvement in factor X correlated with an improvement in the degree of total serum protein (ρ = 0.54; P = 0.04) and proteinuria (ρ = -0.54; P = 0.04). Our findings support the decision to offer ASCT to factor X-deficient patients as both appropriate and efficacious.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 42%
Unspecified 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis
#965
of 1,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,035
of 399,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis
#14
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,720 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.