| Title |
Hydraulic modeling of the 2011 New Madrid Floodway activation: a case study on floodway activation controls
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-015-1680-3 |
| Authors |
Adam Luke, Brad Kaplan, Jeff Neal, Jeremiah Lant, Brett Sanders, Paul Bates, Doug Alsdorf |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 21% |
| Researcher | 5 | 21% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 11 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,133,197
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#175
of 1,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,790
of 258,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#9
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.