| Title |
Diastolic dysfunction and mortality in septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-015-3748-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Filippo Sanfilippo, Carlos Corredor, Nick Fletcher, Giora Landesberg, Umberto Benedetto, Pierre Foex, Maurizio Cecconi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 19% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 10% |
| Poland | 1 | 5% |
| Turkey | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Thailand | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 33% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 29% |
| Unknown | 37 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 60% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 44 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,463,534
of 24,838,271 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,810
of 5,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,928
of 268,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#11
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,838,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.