You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation of the National Early Warning Score in the prehospital setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Resuscitation, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.12.029 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel J. Silcock, Alasdair R. Corfield, Paul A. Gowens, Kevin D. Rooney |
| Abstract |
Early intervention and response to deranged physiological parameters in the critically ill patient improves outcomes. A National Early Warning Score (NEWS) based on physiological observations has been developed for use throughout the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK. Although a good predictor of mortality and deterioration in inpatients, its performance in the prehospital setting is largely untested. This study aimed to assess the validity of the NEWS in unselected prehospital patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 47% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 21% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 219 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 19% |
| Unknown | 57 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 25% |
| Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 65 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,171,412
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#323
of 5,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,106
of 362,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#6
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.