| Title |
Effect of the AutoPulse™ automated band chest compression device on hemodynamics in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-010-1784-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
François-Xavier Duchateau, Papa Gueye, Sonja Curac, Florence Tubach, Claire Broche, Patrick Plaisance, Didier Payen, Jean Mantz, Agnès Ricard-Hibon |
| Abstract |
Guidelines for advanced life support of cardiac arrest (CA) emphasize continuous and effective chest compressions as one of the main factors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) success. The use of an automated load distributing chest compression device for CPR is promising but initial studies on survival show contradictory results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of AutoPulse on blood pressure (BP) in out-of-hospital CA patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Chile | 2 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 25 | 33% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 17% |
| Engineering | 7 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2015.
All research outputs
#3,877,168
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,034
of 4,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,949
of 93,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#9
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.