↓ Skip to main content

Cerebrovascular Hemodynamics During the Practice of Bhramari Pranayama, Kapalbhati and Bahir-Kumbhaka: An Exploratory Study

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Cerebrovascular Hemodynamics During the Practice of Bhramari Pranayama, Kapalbhati and Bahir-Kumbhaka: An Exploratory Study
Published in
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10484-017-9387-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Nivethitha, A. Mooventhan, N. K. Manjunath, Lokesh Bathala, Vijay K. Sharma

Abstract

Various pranayama techniques are known to produce different physiological effects. We evaluated the effect of three-different pranayama techniques on cerebrovascular hemodynamics. Eighteen healthy volunteers with the mean ± standard deviation age of 23.78 ± 2.96 years were performed three-different pranayama techniques: (1) Bhramari, (2) Kapalbhati and (3) Bahir-Kumbhaka in three-different orders. Continuous transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring was performed before, during and after the pranayama techniques. TCD parameters such as peak systolic velocity, end diastolic velocity (EDV), mean flow velocity (MFV) and pulsatility index (PI) of right middle cerebral artery were recorded. Practice of Kapalbhati showed significant reductions in EDV and MFV with significant increase in PI while, Bahir-Kumbhaka showed significant increase in EDV and MFV with significant reduction in PI. However, no such significant changes were observed in Bhramari pranayama. Various types of pranayama techniques produce different cerebrovascular hemodynamic changes in healthy volunteers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 24 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Psychology 7 9%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 25 31%