↓ Skip to main content

Nighttime light level co-distributes with breast cancer incidence worldwide

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Nighttime light level co-distributes with breast cancer incidence worldwide
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10552-010-9624-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Itai Kloog, Richard G. Stevens, Abraham Haim, Boris A. Portnov

Abstract

Breast cancer incidence varies widely among countries of the world for largely unknown reasons. We investigated whether country-level light at night (LAN) is associated with incidence. We compared incidence rates of five common cancers in women (breast, lung, colorectal, larynx, and liver), observed in 164 countries of the world from the GLOBOCAN database, with population-weighted country-level LAN, and with several developmental and environmental indicators, including fertility rate, per capita income, percent of urban population, and electricity consumption. Two types of regression models were used in the analysis: Ordinary Least Squares and Spatial Errors. We found a significant positive association between population LAN level and incidence rates of breast cancer. There was no such an association between LAN level and colorectal, larynx, liver, and lung cancers. A sensitivity test, holding other variables at their average values, yielded a 30-50% higher risk of breast cancer in the highest LAN exposed countries compared to the lowest LAN exposed countries. The possibility that under-reporting from the registries in the low-resource, and also low-LAN, countries created a spurious association was evaluated in several ways and shown not to account for the results. These findings provide coherence of the previously reported case-control and cohort studies with the co-distribution of LAN and breast cancer in entire populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 144 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 13%
Environmental Science 16 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 39 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,270,998
of 24,527,858 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#122
of 2,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,810
of 98,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,527,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.