↓ Skip to main content

The Embodiment of Emotional Feelings in the Brain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
533 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Embodiment of Emotional Feelings in the Brain
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, September 2010
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.1725-10.2010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil A. Harrison, Marcus A. Gray, Peter J. Gianaros, Hugo D. Critchley

Abstract

Central to Walter Cannon's challenge to peripheral theories of emotion was that bodily arousal responses are too undifferentiated to account for the wealth of emotional feelings. Despite considerable evidence to the contrary, this remains widely accepted and for nearly a century has left the issue of whether visceral afferent signals are essential for emotional experience unresolved. Here we combine functional magnetic resonance imaging and multiorgan physiological recording to dissect experience of two distinct disgust forms and their relationship to peripheral and central physiological activity. We show that experience of core and body-boundary-violation disgust are dissociable in both peripheral autonomic and central neural responses and also that emotional experience specific to anterior insular activity encodes these different underlying patterns of peripheral physiological responses. These findings demonstrate that organ-specific physiological responses differentiate emotional feeling states and support the hypothesis that central representations of organism physiological homeostasis constitute a critical aspect of the neural basis of feelings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 533 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 3%
United Kingdom 10 2%
Australia 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 480 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 122 23%
Researcher 101 19%
Student > Master 57 11%
Student > Bachelor 41 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 7%
Other 120 23%
Unknown 54 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 219 41%
Neuroscience 65 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 53 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 9%
Social Sciences 14 3%
Other 51 10%
Unknown 81 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,234,841
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#1,875
of 24,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,791
of 107,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#11
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.