You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Towards socio‐material approaches in simulation‐based education: lessons from complexity theory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Education, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/medu.12638 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tara Fenwick, Madeleine Abrandt Dahlgren |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 27% |
| Canada | 5 | 14% |
| Australia | 5 | 14% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 38% |
| Scientists | 14 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 15% |
| Researcher | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 50 | 29% |
| Unknown | 30 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 35 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 14% |
| Psychology | 9 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,745,109
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Medical Education
#246
of 3,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,815
of 278,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Education
#6
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.