↓ Skip to main content

What can Neuroscience Contribute to the Debate Over Nudging?

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Philosophy and Psychology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 463)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
What can Neuroscience Contribute to the Debate Over Nudging?
Published in
Review of Philosophy and Psychology, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13164-015-0240-9
Authors

Gidon Felsen, Peter B. Reiner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 154 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 27%
Social Sciences 26 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 7%
Decision Sciences 7 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 4%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,839,999
of 24,698,625 outputs
Outputs from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#46
of 463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,595
of 267,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,698,625 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.