↓ Skip to main content

In vitro transcription profiling of the σ S subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase: re-definition of the σ S regulon and identification of σ S -specific promoter sequence elements

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vitro transcription profiling of the σ S subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase: re-definition of the σ S regulon and identification of σ S -specific promoter sequence elements
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, March 2011
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkr129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Maciąg, Clelia Peano, Alessandro Pietrelli, Thomas Egli, Gianluca De Bellis, Paolo Landini

Abstract

Specific promoter recognition by bacterial RNA polymerase is mediated by σ subunits, which assemble with RNA polymerase core enzyme (E) during transcription initiation. However, σ(70) (the housekeeping σ subunit) and σ(S) (an alternative σ subunit mostly active during slow growth) recognize almost identical promoter sequences, thus raising the question of how promoter selectivity is achieved in the bacterial cell. To identify novel sequence determinants for selective promoter recognition, we performed run-off/microarray (ROMA) experiments with RNA polymerase saturated either with σ(70) (Eσ(70)) or with σ(S) (Eσ(S)) using the whole Escherichia coli genome as DNA template. We found that Eσ(70), in the absence of any additional transcription factor, preferentially transcribes genes associated with fast growth (e.g. ribosomal operons). In contrast, Eσ(S) efficiently transcribes genes involved in stress responses, secondary metabolism as well as RNAs from intergenic regions with yet-unknown function. Promoter sequence comparison suggests that, in addition to different conservation of the -35 sequence and of the UP element, selective promoter recognition by either form of RNA polymerase can be affected by the A/T content in the -10/+1 region. Indeed, site-directed mutagenesis experiments confirmed that an A/T bias in the -10/+1 region could improve promoter recognition by Eσ(S).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Italy 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 141 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 27%
Researcher 35 23%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 26 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#7,486
of 27,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,778
of 119,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#28
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.