↓ Skip to main content

Multi-center reproducibility of structural, diffusion tensor, and resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging measures

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Multi-center reproducibility of structural, diffusion tensor, and resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging measures
Published in
Neuroradiology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00234-018-2017-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Deprez, Michiel B. de Ruiter, S. Bogaert, R. Peeters, J. Belderbos, D. De Ruysscher, S. Schagen, S. Sunaert, P. Pullens, E. Achten

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess multi-center reproducibility and longitudinal consistency of MRI imaging measurements, as part of a phase III longitudinal multi-center study comparing the neurotoxic effect following prophylactic cranial irradiation with hippocampal avoidance (HA-PCI), in comparison with conventional PCI in patients with small-cell lung cancer. Harmonized MRI acquisition protocols from six participating sites and two different vendors were compared using both physical and human phantoms. We assessed variability across sites and time points by evaluating various phantoms and data including hippocampal volume, diffusion metrics, and resting-state fMRI, from two healthy volunteers. We report average coefficients of variation (CV) below 5% for intrascanner, intravendor, and intervendor reproducibility for both structural and diffusion imaging metrics, except for diffusion metrics obtained from tractography with average CVs ranging up to 7.8%. Additionally, resting-state fMRI showed stable temporal SNR and reliable generation of subjects DMN across vendors and time points. These findings indicate that the presented multi-site MRI acquisition protocol can be used in a longitudinal study design and that pooling of the acquired data as part of the phase III longitudinal HA-PCI project is possible with careful monitoring of the results of the half-yearly QA assessment to follow-up on potential scanner-related longitudinal changes in image quality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Neuroscience 4 10%
Psychology 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2018.
All research outputs
#13,901,523
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#627
of 1,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,545
of 327,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,403 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.