↓ Skip to main content

Hydroclimatic changes and drivers in the Sava River Catchment and comparison with Swedish catchments

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Hydroclimatic changes and drivers in the Sava River Catchment and comparison with Swedish catchments
Published in
Ambio, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13280-015-0641-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lea Levi, Fernando Jaramillo, Roko Andričević, Georgia Destouni

Abstract

In this study, we investigate long-term hydroclimatic changes and their possible relation to regional changes in climate, land-use and water-use over the twentieth century in the transboundary Sava River Catchment (SRC) in South Eastern Europe. In a hydropower dominated part of the SRC, unlike in an unregulated part, we find increase in average annual evapotranspiration and decrease in temporal runoff variability, which are not readily explainable by observed concurrent climate change in temperature and precipitation and may be more related to landscape-internal change drivers. Among the latter investigated here, results indicate hydropower developments as most closely related to the found hydroclimatic shifts, consistent with previous such indications in studies of Swedish hydropower catchments. Overall, the present results have quantitatively framed the recent history and present state of hydroclimate in the SRC, of relevance for water resources in several countries and for a majority of their populations. This provides a useful basis for further assessment of possible future hydroclimatic changes, under different scenarios of climate change and land/water-use developments in the region.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 22%
Engineering 6 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2015.
All research outputs
#18,403,994
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,522
of 1,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,716
of 258,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.