↓ Skip to main content

Kinesio taping compared to physical therapy modalities for the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
556 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Kinesio taping compared to physical therapy modalities for the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10067-010-1475-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erkan Kaya, Murat Zinnuroglu, Ilknur Tugcu

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the efficacy of kinesio tape and physical therapy modalities in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. Patients (n = 55) were treated with kinesio tape (n = 30) three times by intervals of 3 days or a daily program of local modalities (n = 25) for 2 weeks. Response to treatment was evaluated with the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scale. Patients were questioned for the night pain, daily pain, and pain with motion. Outcome measures except for the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scale were assessed at baseline, first, and second weeks of the treatment. Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scale was evaluated only before and after the treatment. Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scale and visual analog scale scores decreased significantly in both treatment groups as compared with the baseline levels. The rest, night, and movement median pain scores of the kinesio taping (20, 40, and 50, respectively) group were statistically significantly lower (p values were 0.001, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively) at the first week examination as compared with the physical therapy group (50, 70, and 70, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in the same parameters between two groups at the second week (0.109, 0.07, and 0.218 for rest, night, and movement median pain scores, respectively). Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scale scores of the kinesio taping group were significantly lower at the second week as compared with the physical therapy group. No side effects were observed. Kinesio tape has been found to be more effective than the local modalities at the first week and was similarly effective at the second week of the treatment. Kinesio taping may be an alternative treatment option in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome especially when an immediate effect is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 556 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 537 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 120 22%
Student > Bachelor 119 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 7%
Student > Postgraduate 37 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 6%
Other 101 18%
Unknown 103 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 206 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 101 18%
Sports and Recreations 69 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 2%
Neuroscience 9 2%
Other 39 7%
Unknown 120 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,661,721
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#528
of 2,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,608
of 94,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.