↓ Skip to main content

NeuroAIDS in Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroVirology, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
NeuroAIDS in Africa
Published in
Journal of NeuroVirology, May 2010
DOI 10.3109/13550284.2010.489597
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin Robertson, Jeff Liner, James Hakim, Jean-Louis Sankalé, Igor Grant, Scott Letendre, David Clifford, Amadou Gallo Diop, Assan Jaye, Georgette Kanmogne, Alfred Njamnshi, T. Dianne Langford, Tufa Gemechu Weyessa, Charles Wood, Mwanza Banda, Mina Hosseinipour, Ned Sacktor, Noeline Nakasuja, Paul Bangirana, Robert Paul, John Joska, Joseph Wong, Michael Boivin, Penny Holding, Betsy Kammerer, Annelies Van Rie, Prudence Ive, Avindra Nath, Kathy Lawler, Clement Adebamowo, Walter Royal, Jeymohan Joseph, NeuroAIDS in Africa Conference Participants

Abstract

In July 2009, the Center for Mental Health Research on AIDS at the National Institute of Mental Health organized and supported the meeting "NeuroAIDS in Africa." This meeting was held in Cape Town, South Africa, and was affiliated with the 5th IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention. Presentations began with an overview of the epidemiology of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa, the molecular epidemiology of HIV, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HANDs), and HAND treatment. These introductory talks were followed by presentations on HAND research and clinical care in Botswana, Cameroon, Ethiopia, The Gambia, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa, Uganda, and Zambia. Topics discussed included best practices for assessing neurocognitive disorders, patterns of central nervous system (CNS) involvement in the region, subtype-associated risk for HAND, pediatric HIV assessments and neurodevelopment, HIV-associated CNS opportunistic infections and immune reconstitution syndrome, the evolving changes in treatment implementation, and various opportunities and strategies for NeuroAIDS research and capacity building in the region.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 3 2%
United States 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 141 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 10 7%
Other 41 28%
Unknown 28 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 35%
Psychology 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 36 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2013.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroVirology
#481
of 1,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,101
of 104,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroVirology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.