↓ Skip to main content

Not a One-Way Street: Bidirectional Relations Between Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge of Mathematics

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Psychology Review, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 763)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
35 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
359 Mendeley
Title
Not a One-Way Street: Bidirectional Relations Between Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge of Mathematics
Published in
Educational Psychology Review, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x
Authors

Bethany Rittle-Johnson, Michael Schneider, Jon R. Star

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 352 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 19%
Student > Master 65 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 9%
Researcher 31 9%
Lecturer 28 8%
Other 50 14%
Unknown 84 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 85 24%
Mathematics 59 16%
Psychology 55 15%
Arts and Humanities 18 5%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 92 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#356,709
of 25,241,031 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#31
of 763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,063
of 269,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,241,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.