↓ Skip to main content

Pricing strategies in inelastic energy markets: can we use less if we can’t extract more?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers of Earth Science, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 148)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Pricing strategies in inelastic energy markets: can we use less if we can’t extract more?
Published in
Frontiers of Earth Science, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11707-013-0410-y
Authors

Alexey Voinov, Tatiana Filatova

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Latvia 1 4%
Netherlands 1 4%
Unknown 21 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Master 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 13%
Engineering 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,212,132
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers of Earth Science
#20
of 148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,383
of 223,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers of Earth Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 148 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them