↓ Skip to main content

Isolated Ficus trees deliver dual conservation and development benefits in a rural landscape

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Isolated Ficus trees deliver dual conservation and development benefits in a rural landscape
Published in
Ambio, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13280-015-0645-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Eden W. Cottee-Jones, Omesh Bajpai, Lal B. Chaudhary, Robert J. Whittaker

Abstract

Many of the world's rural populations are dependent on the local provision of economically and medicinally important plant resources. However, increasing land-use intensity is depleting these resources, reducing human welfare, and thereby constraining development. Here we investigate a low cost strategy to manage the availability of valuable plant resources, facilitated by the use of isolated Ficus trees as restoration nuclei. We surveyed the plants growing under 207 isolated trees in Assam, India, and categorized them according to their local human-uses. We found that Ficus trees were associated with double the density of important high-grade timber, firewood, human food, livestock fodder, and medicinal plants compared to non-Ficus trees. Management practices were also important in determining the density of valuable plants, with grazing pressure and land-use intensity significantly affecting densities in most categories. Community management practices that conserve isolated Ficus trees, and restrict livestock grazing and high-intensity land-use in their vicinity, can promote plant growth and the provision of important local resources.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Madagascar 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 23%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,265,771
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,583
of 1,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,537
of 262,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#17
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.