Title |
Randomized Comparison of Selective Internal Radiotherapy (SIRT) Versus Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00270-014-1012-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael B. Pitton, Roman Kloeckner, Christian Ruckes, Gesine M. Wirth, Waltraud Eichhorn, Marcus A. Wörns, Arndt Weinmann, Mathias Schreckenberger, Peter R. Galle, Gerd Otto, Christoph Dueber |
Abstract |
To prospectively compare SIRT and DEB-TACE for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 118 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 18 | 15% |
Researcher | 15 | 12% |
Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
Other | 28 | 23% |
Unknown | 28 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 47% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 17 | 14% |
Unknown | 30 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,282,098
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#453
of 2,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,107
of 262,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.