↓ Skip to main content

Randomized Comparison of Selective Internal Radiotherapy (SIRT) Versus Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Randomized Comparison of Selective Internal Radiotherapy (SIRT) Versus Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00270-014-1012-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael B. Pitton, Roman Kloeckner, Christian Ruckes, Gesine M. Wirth, Waltraud Eichhorn, Marcus A. Wörns, Arndt Weinmann, Mathias Schreckenberger, Peter R. Galle, Gerd Otto, Christoph Dueber

Abstract

To prospectively compare SIRT and DEB-TACE for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 118 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 15%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 28 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,282,098
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#453
of 2,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,107
of 262,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.