You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Self-Screening and Non-Physician Screening for Hypertension in Communities: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Hypertension, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ajh/hpv029 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susannah Fleming, Helen Atherton, David McCartney, James Hodgkinson, Sheila Greenfield, Frederick David Richard Hobbs, Jonathan Mant, Richard J. McManus, Matthew Thompson, Alison Ward, Carl Heneghan |
| Abstract |
Community-based self-screening may provide opportunities to increase detection of hypertension, and identify raised blood pressure (BP) in populations who do not access healthcare. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of non-physician screening and self-screening of BP in community settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 24% |
| Unknown | 43 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 43 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,910,125
of 25,378,799 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Hypertension
#582
of 2,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,848
of 270,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Hypertension
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,799 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.