↓ Skip to main content

Simultaneous K-ras activation and Keap1 deletion cause atrophy of pancreatic parenchyma

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal & Liver Physiology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simultaneous K-ras activation and Keap1 deletion cause atrophy of pancreatic parenchyma
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal & Liver Physiology, September 2017
DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.00228.2017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shin Hamada, Tooru Shimosegawa, Keiko Taguchi, Tatsuhide Nabeshima, Masayuki Yamamoto, Atsushi Masamune

Abstract

The Keap1-Nrf2 system has a wide variety of effects in addition to the oxidative stress response, such as growth promotion and chemoresistance of cancer cells. Nrf2 is constitutively activated in most cancer cells. However, the activation of Nrf2 together with oncogenic mutations does not always result in cancer promotion. K-ras(LSL-G12D/+)::p53(LSL-R172H/+)::Pdx-1-Cre (KPC) mice are an established model of pancreatic cancer, which specifically express mutants of both K-ras and p53 in the pancreas by using Pdx-1-Cre. We here generated KC::Keap1(fl/fl) (KC::Keap1) and KPC::Keap1(fl/fl) (KPC::Keap1) mice in which Nrf2 is constitutively activated by Keap1 deletion. KC::Keap1 and KPC::Keap1 mice started to die or showed obvious weakness at approximately around 40 days after birth. Histological examination revealed that KC::Keap1 and KPC::Keap1 mice did not develop pancreatic cancer, but, instead, progressive atrophy of the pancreatic parenchyma. In these mice, amylase-positive acinar cells as well as insulin- and glucagon-positive islet cells were decreased and surrounded by fibrotic tissues. KC::Keap1 and KPC::Keap1 mice presented lower body weight and glucose levels than C::Keap1 mice, presumably resulting from pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Histological changes were not obvious in C::Keap1 and PC::Keap1 mice. The presence of the p53 mutation did not affect the phenotypes in KC::Keap1 mice. Heterologous or homologous Nrf2 deletion (Nrf2(+/-) or Nrf2(-/-)) rescued the pancreatic phenotypes, weight loss and hypoglycemia in KC::Keap1 mice, suggesting that Nrf2 is a major downstream target of Keap1. In conclusion, simultaneous K-ras activation and Keap1 deletion caused progressive atrophy of the pancreatic parenchyma in mice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal & Liver Physiology
#1,547
of 2,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,332
of 328,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal & Liver Physiology
#22
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.