↓ Skip to main content

Amazon dams and waterways: Brazil’s Tapajós Basin plans

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
Title
Amazon dams and waterways: Brazil’s Tapajós Basin plans
Published in
Ambio, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13280-015-0642-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip M. Fearnside

Abstract

Brazil plans to build 43 "large" dams (>30 MW) in the Tapajós Basin, ten of which are priorities for completion by 2022. Impacts include flooding indigenous lands and conservation units. The Tapajós River and two tributaries (the Juruena and Teles Pires Rivers) are also the focus of plans for waterways to transport soybeans from Mato Grosso to ports on the Amazon River. Dams would allow barges to pass rapids and waterfalls. The waterway plans require dams in a continuous chain, including the Chacorão Dam that would flood 18 700 ha of the Munduruku Indigenous Land. Protections in Brazil's constitution and legislation and in international conventions are easily neutralized through application of "security suspensions," as has already occurred during licensing of several dams currently under construction in the Tapajós Basin. Few are aware of "security suspensions," resulting in little impetus to change these laws.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 208 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 17%
Researcher 33 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 43 20%
Unknown 45 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 54 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 8%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Energy 6 3%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 57 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#521,660
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#57
of 1,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,161
of 277,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.