↓ Skip to main content

Myoepithelial Neoplasms of Soft Tissue: An Updated Review of the Clinicopathologic, Immunophenotypic, and Genetic Features

Overview of attention for article published in Head and Neck Pathology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Myoepithelial Neoplasms of Soft Tissue: An Updated Review of the Clinicopathologic, Immunophenotypic, and Genetic Features
Published in
Head and Neck Pathology, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12105-015-0618-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vickie Y. Jo, Christopher D. M. Fletcher

Abstract

Myoepithelial tumors in skin and soft tissue are uncommon but have been increasingly characterized over the past decade. Men and women are equally affected across all age groups and lesions arise most frequently on the extremities and limb girdles. Approximately 20 % of cases occur in pediatric patients, in whom they are frequently malignant. Similar to their salivary gland counterparts, myoepithelial tumors of soft tissue demonstrate heterogeneous morphologic and immunophenotypic features. Tumors are classified as mixed tumor/chondroid syringoma, myoepithelioma, and myoepithelial carcinoma; in soft tissue, tumors having at least moderate cytologic atypia are classified as malignant. Mixed tumor and myoepithelioma show a benign clinical course, with recurrence in up to 20 % (typically secondary to incomplete excision), and do not metastasize. In contrast, myoepithelial carcinoma shows more aggressive behavior with recurrence and metastasis in up to 40-50 % of cases. The majority of myoepithelial neoplasms typically coexpress epithelial antigens (cytokeratin and/or EMA) and S-100 protein; GFAP and p63 are frequently positive and a subset of malignant neoplasms lose INI1 expression. Up to 45 % of myoepitheliomas and myoepithelial carcinomas harbor EWSR1 gene rearrangements, unlike mixed tumor/chondroid syringoma which is characterized by PLAG1 gene rearrangement. While mixed tumor/chondroid syringoma are likely related to primary salivary myoepithelial tumors, soft tissue myoepithelioma and myoepithelial carcinoma appear to be pathologically distinct neoplasms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 21%
Student > Postgraduate 9 14%
Researcher 6 9%
Professor 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 71%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Psychology 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,600,087
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Head and Neck Pathology
#525
of 932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,998
of 263,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head and Neck Pathology
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.