↓ Skip to main content

Saccadic latency distributions in Parkinson’s disease and the effects of l-dopa

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Saccadic latency distributions in Parkinson’s disease and the effects of l-dopa
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00221-006-0412-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. W. Michell, Z. Xu, D. Fritz, S. J. G. Lewis, T. Foltynie, C. H. Williams-Gray, T. W. Robbins, R. H. S. Carpenter, R. A. Barker

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with a loss of central dopaminergic pathways in the brain leading to an abnormality of movement, including saccades. In PD, analysis of saccadic latency distributions, rather than mean latencies, can provide much more information about how the neural decision process that precedes movement is affected by disease or medication. Subject to the constraints of intersubject variation and reproducibility, latency distribution may represent an attractive potential biomarker of PD. Here we report two studies that provide information about these parameters, and demonstrate a novel effect of dopamine on saccadic latency, implying that it influences the neural decision process itself. We performed a detailed cross-sectional study of saccadic latency distributions during a simple step task in 22 medicated patients and 27 age-matched controls. This revealed high intersubject variability and an overlap of PD and control distributions. A second study was undertaken on a different population specifically to investigate the effects of dopamine on saccadic latency distributions in 15 PD patients. L-dopa was found to prolong latency, although the magnitude of the effect varied between subjects. The implications of these observations for the use of saccadic latency distributions as a potential biomarker of PD are discussed, as are the effects of L-dopa on neural decision making, where it is postulated to increase the criterion level of evidence required before the decision to move is made.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 107 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 19%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 29 26%
Unknown 22 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 23%
Psychology 19 17%
Neuroscience 18 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,265,771
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#2,909
of 3,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,441
of 78,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.