↓ Skip to main content

Target-controlled infusion of propofol for sedation in patients with non-invasive ventilation failure due to low tolerance: a preliminary study

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Target-controlled infusion of propofol for sedation in patients with non-invasive ventilation failure due to low tolerance: a preliminary study
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00134-010-1904-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin Clouzeau, Hoang-Nam Bui, Frederic Vargas, Marieke Grenouillet-Delacre, Emmanuelle Guilhon, Didier Gruson, Gilles Hilbert

Abstract

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in critically ill patients is associated with a high failure rate. This prospective study assessed the feasibility and safety of target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol for conscious sedation during NIV in patients with NIV failure due to low tolerance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
France 1 1%
Ethiopia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 63 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 68%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,753,975
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,941
of 5,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,097
of 96,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.