Title |
Preventing premature deaths from breast and cervical cancer among underserved women in the United States: insights gained from a national cancer screening program
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10552-015-0541-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mary C. White, Faye L. Wong |
Abstract |
This commentary highlights some of the valuable insights gained from a special collection of papers that utilized data from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) and appear in this special issue. The data and experiences of the NBCCEDP can inform the identification of new opportunities and directions for meeting the cancer screening needs of underserved women in a complex and changing health care environment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
Researcher | 4 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 35% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,835,565
of 25,099,766 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#890
of 2,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,713
of 292,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#10
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,099,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.