You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of fibroblast growth factor NV1FGF on amputation and death: a randomised placebo-controlled trial of gene therapy in critical limb ischaemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60394-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jill Belch, William R Hiatt, Iris Baumgartner, I Vickie Driver, Sigrid Nikol, Lars Norgren, Eric Van Belle, on behalf of the TAMARIS Committees and Investigators |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 206 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 51 | 24% |
| Unknown | 47 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 8% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 54 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2011.
All research outputs
#5,587,283
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#20,963
of 43,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,850
of 127,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#182
of 408 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 408 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.