↓ Skip to main content

The incidence of acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy and its impact on treatment in the first cycle: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
The incidence of acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy and its impact on treatment in the first cycle: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Cancer, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12885-018-4185-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Endale Gebreegziabher Gebremedhn, Peter John Shortland, David Anthony Mahns

Abstract

Although acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy (OXIPN) is frequently regarded to be transient, recent studies have reported prolongation of infusion times, dose reduction and treatment cessation following the first dose of oxaliplatin in quarter of patients. Acute OXIPN is also a well-established risk factor for chronic neuropathy. However, there is underreporting of these parameters during the acute phase (≤ 14 days). This paper systematically reviews the incidence of acute OXIPN and its impact on treatment in the first cycle. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Medline. Published original articles were included if they described details about prevalence of oxaliplatin-induced acute neuropathy. Fourteen studies, comprised of 6211 patients were evaluated. The majority of patients were treated with oxaliplatin in combination with leucovorin and fluorouracil (FOLFOX). Most studies used the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria to assess acute neuropathy. Acute neuropathy (Grades 1-4) was the most common event with prevalence ranging from 4-98%, followed by haematological (1.4-81%) and gastrointestinal (1.2-67%) toxicities, respectively. Drug regimens, starting dose of oxaliplatin and neuropathy assessment tools varied across studies. In addition, moderate to severe toxicities were common in patients that received a large dose of oxaliplatin (> 85 mg/m2) and/ or combined drugs. The majority of studies did not report the factors affecting acute neuropathy namely the range (minimal) doses required to evoke acute neuropathy, patient and clinical risk factors. In addition, there was no systematic reporting of the number of patients subjected to prolonged infusion, dose reduction, treatment delay and treatment cessation during the acute phase. Despite the heterogeneity of studies regarding oxaliplatin starting dose, drug regimen, neuropathy assessment tools and study design, a large number of patients developed acute neuropathy. To develop a better preventive and therapeutic guideline for acute/chronic neuropathy, a prospective study should be conducted in a large cohort of patients in relation to drug regimen, starting/ranges (minimal) of doses producing acute neuropathy, treatment compliance, patient and clinical risk factors using a standardised neuropathy assessment tool.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 43 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 46 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,719,295
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,209
of 8,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,609
of 328,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#46
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,326 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.