↓ Skip to main content

Interactions between distal speech rate, linguistic knowledge, and speech environment

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Interactions between distal speech rate, linguistic knowledge, and speech environment
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 2015
DOI 10.3758/s13423-015-0820-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tuuli Morrill, Melissa Baese-Berk, Christopher Heffner, Laura Dilley

Abstract

During lexical access, listeners use both signal-based and knowledge-based cues, and information from the linguistic context can affect the perception of acoustic speech information. Recent findings suggest that the various cues used in lexical access are implemented with flexibility and may be affected by information from the larger speech context. We conducted 2 experiments to examine effects of a signal-based cue (distal speech rate) and a knowledge-based cue (linguistic structure) on lexical perception. In Experiment 1, we manipulated distal speech rate in utterances where an acoustically ambiguous critical word was either obligatory for the utterance to be syntactically well formed (e.g., Conner knew that bread and butter (are) both in the pantry) or optional (e.g., Don must see the harbor (or) boats). In Experiment 2, we examined identical target utterances as in Experiment 1 but changed the distribution of linguistic structures in the fillers. The results of the 2 experiments demonstrate that speech rate and linguistic knowledge about critical word obligatoriness can both influence speech perception. In addition, it is possible to alter the strength of a signal-based cue by changing information in the speech environment. These results provide support for models of word segmentation that include flexible weighting of signal-based and knowledge-based cues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 6%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 28%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 9 25%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 28%
Linguistics 9 25%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 25%