You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Could violent conflict derail the London Declaration on NTDs?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006136 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Y. Du, Jeffrey D. Stanaway, Peter J. Hotez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 15% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 71% |
| Scientists | 9 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#975,300
of 25,547,324 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#543
of 9,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,467
of 341,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#17
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.