| Title |
Learned magnetic field discrimination in yellowfin tuna,Thunnus albacares
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, September 1984
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00610853 |
| Authors |
Michael M. Walker |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 25% |
| Researcher | 13 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 63% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,130,895
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#53
of 1,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69
of 8,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them