↓ Skip to main content

Testing the neoflightless hypothesis: propatagium reveals flying ancestry of oviraptorosaurs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ornithology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Testing the neoflightless hypothesis: propatagium reveals flying ancestry of oviraptorosaurs
Published in
Journal of Ornithology, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10336-015-1190-9
Authors

Alan Feduccia, Stephen A. Czerkas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Chile 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 22%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 14 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2022.
All research outputs
#14,330,136
of 24,945,754 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#1,254
of 1,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,864
of 269,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#39
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,945,754 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.