Title |
How Do Allied Health Professionals Define and Apply Equity When Making Resource Allocation Decisions?
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Social Determinants of Health and Health Services, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.1177/0020731418762721 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Haylee Lane, Tamica Sturgess, Kathleen Philip, Donna Markham, Jill Walsh, Wendy Hubbard, Jennifer Martin, Terry Haines |
Abstract |
An ethnographic study was conducted in 2 stages to understand how allied health professionals define and apply equity when making resource allocation decisions. Participants were allied health managers and clinicians from Victoria, Australia. Stage 1 included 4 semi-structured forums that incorporated real-life case studies, group discussions, and hypothetical scenarios. The project's steering committee began a thematic analysis during post-forum discussions. Stage 2 included a key stakeholder working party that further discussed the concept of equity. The forum recordings were transcribed verbatim, and a detailed thematic analysis ensured the initial thematic analysis was complete. Several domains of equity were discussed. Participants would readily identify that equity was a consideration when making resource decisions but were generally silent for a prolonged period when prompted to identify what they meant when using this term. The findings indicate that asking allied health professionals to directly state how they define and apply equity to their decision-making could be too difficult a task, as this did not elicit rich and meaningful discussions. Future research should examine individual domains of equity when applied to resource allocation decisions. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 9 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 23% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 9 | 35% |