You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Neonatal outcomes following elective caesarean delivery at term: a hospital-based cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, September 2015
|
DOI | 10.3109/14767058.2015.1023187 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daragh Finn, Sinéad M. O’Neill, Aedin Collins, Ali S. Khashan, Keelin O’Donoghue, Eugene Dempsey |
Abstract |
To assess neonatal outcomes following elective Caesarean Delivery [1] at term (≥37+0 weeks gestation). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Philippines | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 16% |
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Psychology | 2 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#658,286
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
#33
of 3,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,738
of 277,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
#1
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,280 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.