↓ Skip to main content

Neonatal Levels of T-cell Receptor Excision Circles (TREC) in Patients with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome and Later Disease Features

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Immunology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Neonatal Levels of T-cell Receptor Excision Circles (TREC) in Patients with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome and Later Disease Features
Published in
Journal of Clinical Immunology, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10875-015-0153-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kiran A. Gul, Torstein Øverland, Liv Osnes, Lars O. Baumbusch, Rolf D. Pettersen, Kari Lima, Tore G. Abrahamsen

Abstract

Newborns with severe T-cell lymphopenia, including those with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (DS), have low numbers of T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs). The aim of this study was to determine a possible correlation between neonatal TRECs in 22q11.2DS and the development of different phenotypes to elucidate the prognostic value of TREC in this disease. In this national survey including 46 patients with 22q11.2DS born after 2005, TREC levels were determined using stored newborn screening blood spots on filter cards. Patients were grouped into quartiles according to their TREC values, except the two infants with thymus aplasia. The two patients with thymic aplasia had no detectable TREC. The rest had no severe clinical immunodeficiency. There was a significant correlation between low TRECs and the proportion of patients with CD3(+)CD4(+)T-cells below the 5th percentile of healthy infants (p = 0.027) as well as the proportion with an abnormal thymus feature either no thymus or remnant thymus as observed during heart surgery (p = 0.022). Significantly lower TRECs (p = 0.019) were found in patients with cardiac defects compared to no such defects. Patients within the lowest quartile of TREC values (<71 TRECs/μL, n = 11) had more frequent severe cardiac defects than the other quartiles (p = 0.010). Eight of these patients in the lowest quartile needed an operation/intervention within two weeks after birth or died because of a cardiac defect. The low TREC values not only correlate with decreased T-cell immunity, but also with the occurrence of heart defects in the patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Mexico 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 20%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,265,771
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#1,254
of 1,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,155
of 263,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#18
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.