↓ Skip to main content

Dissolution of mesoporous silica supports in aqueous solutions: Implications for mesoporous silica-based water treatment processes

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dissolution of mesoporous silica supports in aqueous solutions: Implications for mesoporous silica-based water treatment processes
Published in
Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, September 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.07.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anh Le-Tuan Pham, David L. Sedlak, Fiona M. Doyle

Abstract

Under pH 7 - 10 conditions, the mesoporous silica supports proposed for use in water treatment are relatively unstable. In batch experiments conducted in pH 7 solutions, the commonly used support SBA-15 dissolved quickly, releasing approximately 30 mg/L of dissolved silica after 2 hours. In column experiments, more than 45% of an initial mass of 0.25 g SBA-15 dissolved within 2 days when a pH 8.5 solution flowed through the column. In a mixed iron oxide/SBA-15 system, the dissolution of SBA-15 changed the iron oxide reactivity toward H(2)O(2) decomposition, because dissolved silica deposited on iron oxide surface and changed its catalytic active sites. As with SBA-15, other mesoporous silica materials including HMS, MCM-41, four types of functionalized SBA-15, and two types of metal oxide-containing SBA-15 also dissolved under circumneutral pH solutions. The dissolution of mesoporous silica materials raises questions about their use under neutral and alkaline pH in aqueous solutions, because silica dissolution might compromise the behavior of the material.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 130 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 27%
Researcher 24 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Master 9 7%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 41 31%
Engineering 19 14%
Materials Science 13 10%
Chemical Engineering 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2015.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
#2,201
of 4,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,253
of 188,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
#29
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,004 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.